A critical part of our work to make Snapchat safer is cooperating with law enforcement and government agencies to fulfill valid requests for information to assist in investigations. We also work to proactively escalate any content that could involve imminent threats to life or bodily harm.

While most content on Snapchat deletes by default, we work to preserve and provide account information to government agencies in accordance with applicable law. Once we have received and established the validity of a legal request for Snapchat account records — which is important in verifying the request is being made by a legitimate law enforcement or government agency and not a bad actor — we respond in compliance with applicable law and privacy requirements.

The charts below detail the types of requests we support from law enforcement and government agencies, including subpoenas and summons, court orders, search warrants, and emergency disclosure requests.

Also, the percentage of requests for which some data was produced is calculated as of the publication date, based on requests received within the reporting period. In infrequent situations where a request was determined to contain a deficiency -- leading Snap not to produce data -- and law enforcement later submitted an amended, valid request after publication of the transparency report, the later production of data would not be reflected in the original or subsequent reporting periods.

* “એકાઉન્ટ ઓળખકર્તાઓ” વપરાશકર્તાની માહિતીની વિનંતી કરતી વખતે કાયદાકીય પ્રક્રિયામાં કાયદાના અમલીકરણ દ્વારા ઉલ્લેખિત એક એકાઉન્ટ સાથે જોડાયેલા ઓળખકર્તાઓની સંખ્યા (દા.ત. વપરાશકર્તાનામ, ઇમેઇલ એડ્રેસ અને ફોન નંબર) દર્શાવે છે. કેટલીક કાયદાકીય પ્રક્રિયા એક કરતાં વધુ ઓળખકર્તા સમાવી શકે છે. કેટલાક ઉદાહરણોમાં, અનેક ઓળખકર્તા એક અકાઉન્ટને ઓળખી શકે છે. એવા કિસ્સાઓમાં જ્યાં એક ઓળખકર્તા અનેક વિનંતીઓમાં નિર્દિષ્ટ હોય ત્યારે, દરેક ઉદાહરણને શામેલ કરવામાં આવે છે.

**બ્રાઝિલ માટે પ્રદર્શિત કરવામાં આવેલ “અન્ય માહિતીની વિનંતીઓ” ફિગરને પહેલાંની અજાણતા થયેલી ભૂલ સુધારવા માટે અપડેટ કરવામાં આવી છે.

Note: Although we do not formally track when we remove content that violates our policies when a request has been made by a governmental entity, we believe it is an extremely rare occurrence. When we believe it is necessary to restrict content that is deemed unlawful in a particular country, but does not otherwise violate our policies, we seek to restrict access to it geographically when possible, rather than remove it globally.

As an additional note, our teams have begun to further improve our governmental takedown operations, to track the information required to be disclosed under the Digital Services Act. In future reports, we will roll out new data points in this category.